Plea Agreements in War Crimes Cases: A Critical Analysis of Negotiated Justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Transitional Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v12i1.1255Palabras clave:
criminal law, war crimes, genocide, transitional justice, plea agreement, Bosnia and HerzegovinaResumen
Considering all the transformations of state regimes in the last forty years and all the conflicts that became past and lasting ones, without any doubt, transitional justice has and will have an essential role in the legal systems of the countries of the world. Establishing the truth and reconciliation are critical tasks. This article correlates transitional justice to the criminal justice procedural institute of “plea agreement” and tests how this institute within one of its mechanisms may become an obstacle in achieving its goals. A case study of its application in the cases of war crimes in Bosnia and Herzegovina will be conducted to test if and how plea agreements have been applied in the cases of those gravest criminal offenses and if its application may achieve the goals of criminal law in one hand, and transitional justice on other. Normative, historical, and comparative scientific methods, in addition to the case study, will be used.
Descargas
Referencias
ALSCHULER, A. W. Plea bargaining and its history. Law & Society Review, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 2, p. 211–246, 1979.
ARTHUR, P. How “transitions” reshaped human rights: A conceptual history of transitional justice. Human Rights Quarterly, [S.l.], v. 31, n. 2, p. 321–367, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.0.0069
BAJOVIC, V. Odmeravanje kazne i sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela. Journal for Criminalistics and Law, [S.l.], v. 20, n. 2, p. 179–193, 2015.
BALDWIN, J.; MCCONVILLE, M. Plea bargaining and plea negotiation in England. Law & Society Review, [S.l.], v. 13, p. 287–308, 1979.
BEENSTOCK, M.; GUETZKOW, J.; KAMENETSKY-YADAN, S. Plea bargaining and the miscarriage of justice. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, [S.l.], v. 37, n. 1, p. 35–72, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09441-w
BIBAS, S. Plea bargaining outside the shadow of trial. Harvard Law Review, [S.l.], v. 117, n. 8, p. 2469–2454, 2004.
BRUNK, C. G. The problem of voluntariness and coercion in the negotiated plea. Law & Society Review, v. 13, n. 2, p. 527–554, 1979.
CALLAN, S. W. An experience in justice without plea negotiation. Law & Society Review, v. 13, p. 327–348, 1979.
DAMAŠKA, M. Negotiated Justice in International Criminal Courts, Journal of International Criminal Justice, V. 2, I. 4, 2004, Pages 1018–1039, https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/2.4.1018
DEVERS, L. Plea and charge bargaining (GS-10f-0114l; pp. 1–8). Bureau of Justice Assistance U.S Department of Justice, 2011.
HEUMANN, M.; LOFTIN, C. Mandatory sentencing and the abolition of plea bargaining: The Michigan felony firearm. Law & Society Review, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 2, p. 393–430, 1979.
JOVOVIĆ, M. I. Sporazum o priznanju krivice – primjena u praksi. Uprava. [S.l.], [s.d.].
KATZ, J. Legality and equality: Plea bargaining in the prosecution of white-collar and common crimes. Law & Society Review, [S.l.], v. 13, p. 431–460, [s.d.].
KAZIĆ ÇAKAR, E. Transitional Justice Efforts and Reconciliation Dynamics in Bosnia and Herzegovina, pp. 87-100, in Preljević, H. et al., Shifting Paradigms, Switzerland: Springer, 2025.
LANGBEIN, J. H. Understanding the short history of plea bargaining. Law and Society Review, [S.l.], [s.d.].
LAWTHER, C.; MOFFETT, L.; JACOBS, D. (Eds.). Research handbook on transitional justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781955314
LIPPKE, R. L. (2006). Retributivism and Plea Bargaining. Criminal Justice Ethics, 25(2), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2006.9992198
MILOŠEVIĆ, D. On the shortcomings of the plea agreement. Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, [S.l.], v. 93, n. 4, p. 1020–1062, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv93-29451
OLIVER, Guillermo. Convenience or inconvenience of requiring the unanimous consent of the co-defendants for the negotiated criminal justice mechanisms (in a restricted sense) in the Chilean criminal procedural system. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, vol. 7, n. 2, p. 1261-1286, mai./ago. 2021. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v7i2.532
PAJIĆ, D.; MASLO ČERKIĆ, Š.; HAJDAROVIĆ, S. Historijski, normativni i praktični aspekti sporazuma o priznanju krivice. Review for Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 18, n. 1, p. 29–53, 2018.
PEI, W. Criminal Procedural Agreements in China, England and Wales, Rotterdam: Erasmus University of Rotterdam, 2015.
POPOVIĆ, D. M. Vodič kroz tranzicijsku pravdu. UNDP, [S.l.], [s.d.].
SIJERČIĆ ČOLIĆ, H. Krivično procesno pravo. Knjiga I Krivičnoprocesni subjekti i krivičnoprocesne radnje. Sarajevo: University of Sarajevo, 2005.
SLOBOGIN, C., Plea Bargaining and the Substantive and Procedural Goals of Criminal Justice: From Retribution and Adversarialism To Preventive Justice And Hybrid-Inquisitorialism, v. 57 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1505 (2016), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol57/iss4/12
TOMIĆ, Z. Krivično pravo I. Sarajevo: University of Sarajevo, 2006.
VIAÑO, E. C. Plea bargaining in the United States: A perversion of justice. Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal, v. 83, n. 1, p. 109, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3917/ridp.831.0109
WAN, Tina. The unnecessary evil of plea bargaining. Review of Law and Social Justice, v. 17, n. 1, p. 33–62, 2007.
WERLE, G. and VORBAUM, M. Transitional Justice, Springer, 2022.
Descargas
Publicado
Declaración de disponibilidad de datos
In compliance with open science policies, all data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Ena Kazić Çakar
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
A partir de 2022, los artículos publicados en el RDPP tienen una licencia Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. Los artículos publicados hasta 2021 adoptaron la licencia Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
Cómo citar
